The DOJ’s Phase 1 application deadline is Sept. 1, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time. That leaves city officials a limited window to determine whether Charlotte will apply, identify the proposed projects and secure the required local support.

What CMPD presented

Police Chief Estella Patterson asked Charlotte City Council on Aug. 10 to support seeking funding through the DOJ’s FY 2026 Model Cities Initiative, Axios reported. Council members raised concerns about surveillance technology, federal involvement and possible effects on immigrant and refugee communities.

According to the Axios report, CMPD described potential uses including technology upgrades, additional positions in gang, juvenile and crime-gun units, court-related work, the sheriff’s office, mental-health services and programs intended to reduce recidivism.

The DOJ application lists a broader range of allowable uses. Those include real-time crime centers, body-worn cameras, license-plate readers, artificial-intelligence systems, small unmanned aircraft, forensic tools, personnel, training, mental-health and substance-use services, victim services, youth intervention and reentry programs.

Those categories describe what the federal initiative may fund, not a final Charlotte purchasing plan. Any Charlotte application would need to explain the city’s strategy, proposed budget, participating agencies or partners and expected public-safety results.

Federal oversight would be built into the award

The DOJ expects to make Model Cities awards as cooperative agreements rather than traditional grants. The application says DOJ would have substantial involvement in developing, implementing, administering and reviewing projects throughout the expected 36-month award period.

Eligible applicants must agree to work with DOJ on those activities and submit proposed subrecipients or partners for federal pre-review and approval. The application also requires applicants to demonstrate support from required and other key stakeholders needed to carry out the project.

That structure matters for Charlotte because an award would not simply provide local officials with unrestricted federal money. The program documents contemplate continuing federal participation in project design, implementation and review.

Immigration and civil-rights conditions

The DOJ application requires a certification concerning 8 U.S.C. § 1373 and compliance with federal civil-rights and nondiscrimination requirements. It says the certification, using the federal template, is a basic minimum requirement for a valid application.

The application also says funded activities may not impede federal immigration-law enforcement, including by failing to comply with § 1373, provide access to Department of Homeland Security agents or honor certain DHS requests. It separately bars activities that violate applicable federal civil-rights or nondiscrimination law.

Those are conditions of the federal funding opportunity. They do not establish that Charlotte has accepted them, because the city has not been confirmed as having submitted an application or received an award.

A possible future reimbursement obligation

The DOJ application includes an award condition concerning future reimbursement of costs associated with federal law-enforcement intervention or assistance during a surge in violent crime or public disorder.

The document describes a possible obligation for an award recipient if the specified circumstances and award terms apply. It is not a current Charlotte liability, and the application does not state a Charlotte-specific amount.

Where Charlotte stands

Axios reported that the council discussed whether to continue spending staff time examining the opportunity, while the city manager discouraged a formal vote to halt that work. The report also said the city council, sheriff and other local officials would need to provide support for an application.

The city’s recorded-meeting repository lists the Aug. 3 Safety Committee meeting and the Aug. 10 Charlotte City Council meeting. Those records establish that the relevant meetings occurred, but the reviewed materials do not establish that Charlotte formally approved or rejected an application, submitted one to DOJ, became a finalist or received funding.

What residents should watch next

The DOJ expects to distribute approximately $300 million through the initiative and select two to four cities after a competitive process. The expected award period is 36 months. Axios reported that Charlotte could seek as much as $150 million; the DOJ documents confirm the total program funding but do not assign Charlotte an individual amount.

Before the Sept. 1 deadline, the key unanswered questions are whether city officials will authorize a submission, what CMPD’s detailed spending plan will contain, which agencies and community partners will participate, who will sign the required certifications or support documents, and how the city would oversee federal involvement.

For Charlotte residents, the decision is about more than the size of a potential award. It could affect the city’s use of surveillance and police technology, the role of federal officials in local public-safety projects, the treatment of immigration-related information and the city’s obligations if a future federal intervention triggers reimbursement terms.

Sources

• U.S. Department of Justice Model Cities Initiative application
• Axios Charlotte report on CMPD’s proposal
• City of Charlotte recorded meetings

Harrington’s appointment followed Mayor Vi Lyles’ planned resignation, which was effective June 30. He took office after that resignation. He was selected from a field of eligible candidates who addressed the council during the appointment process.

The change puts an interim mayor in charge while several major local policy questions remain unresolved. The issues include the future financial and policy consequences of the I-77 South toll lanes, Charlotte’s changing transit governance and rules for data-center development as the city grows.

Transit and toll-lane disputes

Charlotte City Council has reversed its support for the I-77 South toll-lane project. The reversal has created a continuing dispute involving the city, the state and the North Carolina Department of Transportation.

North Carolina’s 2026 budget included a provision requiring Charlotte and other local governments to repay NCDOT for investments in the project, according to local reporting. The amount Charlotte may ultimately owe NCDOT has not been established.

That question gives Harrington and the council a transportation issue with direct implications for city finances and regional policy. The toll lanes are also tied to broader disagreements about how major transportation projects are funded and governed.

Transit governance is changing at the same time. The city’s transit authority is part of an evolving regional structure, leaving the interim mayor to work through questions about how Charlotte’s transportation priorities will be represented and managed.

Growth and development decisions

Charlotte also faces ongoing debates over data-center development, housing and infrastructure. Those discussions come as continued growth increases pressure on the systems and policies that shape where development occurs and how the city supports it.

Data centers have become a distinct development-policy question for the city, while housing and infrastructure remain broader growth concerns. The issues are connected by the decisions local officials make about land use, public investment and the services needed to support new development.

Harrington’s interim tenure therefore begins with a set of decisions that extend beyond a change in City Hall leadership. The mayor and the 11-member Charlotte City Council will face transportation funding questions, transit-governance changes and development debates while the city continues to grow.

What happens next

Harrington’s position is interim, not the result of a citywide election. His tenure and any later process for selecting a permanent mayor remain subject to future city action.

For now, the immediate transition is complete: Lyles’ resignation took effect June 30, and Harrington has assumed the interim mayor’s role. The unresolved toll-lane dispute, the state repayment requirement and Charlotte’s debates over transit, data centers, housing and infrastructure will define the policy environment he inherits.

The project has not been canceled or approved. Charlotte, the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization and the North Carolina Board of Transportation still have separate roles in deciding whether the project remains viable, is reinstated or moves toward removal from the state transportation program.

What Charlotte and CRTPO already voted to do

In May 2026, Charlotte City Council voted 6-5 to rescind the city’s support for the I-77 South public-private partnership. CRTPO later withdrew regional support. Charlotte has significant influence in the regional process because it represents about 41% of CRTPO’s weighted vote, according to the Charlotte Observer.

Those actions did not immediately cancel the project. They created a new decision path involving local governments, state transportation officials and the project’s development schedule.

What the 2026 state law changes

Session Law 2026-41 provides for reimbursement of eligible preliminary project costs by local governments that voted at the May 20, 2026 CRTPO meeting to rescind the October 16, 2024 resolution authorizing a public-private partnership delivery process for I-77 South.

The law also allows a local government to avoid that reimbursement requirement if it votes at a CRTPO meeting held after the law’s effective date to reinstate the October 16, 2024 resolution within 90 days of the provision taking effect. The enacted law authorizes consequences that can include withholding certain state aid or new State Transportation Improvement Program projects until reimbursement is made.

That provision is not the same as a final bill to Charlotte. The cited records do not establish a final reimbursement amount, a final notice of liability or Charlotte’s precise share.

Deadlines and the next decision path

Recent local reporting places the broader reconsideration deadline at October 5, 2026. The Charlotte City Council decision window has been reported as likely to occur before September 23. Neither date is established in the official city notice, NCDOT release or enacted-law section cited here, so residents should watch for formal agendas and notices that confirm the operative schedule.

Charlotte officials and CRTPO delegates must weigh whether to restore support or continue opposing the project. The North Carolina Board of Transportation has a separate role in determining whether the project is removed from the state transportation program.

The next records to watch include a formal Charlotte council agenda, CRTPO meeting materials, state transportation notices and any NCDOT reimbursement calculation. Those documents should clarify which governments are considered responsible for eligible costs and what action is required to preserve or remove the project.

How much money is at stake

The Charlotte Observer reported that NCDOT had committed $600 million to the roughly $3.2 billion project and had already spent about $64 million. The $64 million figure is a reported preliminary regional spending amount, not a confirmed Charlotte-only obligation.

The enacted law creates potential fiscal exposure, but it does not show that Charlotte has already lost state funding or owes a fixed amount. Any final allocation would depend on eligible costs and the responsibilities assigned under the law.

What the project would mean locally

NCDOT describes I-77 South as an approximately 11-mile corridor from Uptown Charlotte to the South Carolina line. The proposed express lanes would use toll financing, but toll rates, discounts, access provisions and other operating details are not final.

NCDOT says the design is only about 10% to 15% complete. Final design is not expected until at least the end of 2027, and construction is not anticipated until the early 2030s. NCDOT has described an elevated design option intended to reduce neighborhood impacts, along with proposed protections and toll-free access for carpools, public transit vehicles and emergency responders; those features remain part of project development and review rather than final guarantees.

For Charlotte residents, commuters, businesses and taxpayers, the consequences could include future toll costs, changes in travel reliability, neighborhood and environmental impacts, and possible effects on state-supported transportation funding. The upcoming votes therefore matter even though construction remains years away.

Public opinion is divided

A July 30 Axios Charlotte report cited a poll showing 51.5% support for moving forward immediately with I-77 South. The survey was shared by CLT Public Relations, which Axios described as a lobbying and advocacy firm whose clients include local governments and organizations seeking influence with local government.

The survey was conducted July 15-18 among 370 registered Charlotte voters. After weighting, its effective sample size was 258, with a reported margin of error of plus or minus 6.1 percentage points.

The result provides context but is not a representative referendum or a neutral mandate. The legal and fiscal process—not the poll alone—will determine what happens next.

For Charlotte residents, the practical takeaway is that I-77 South remains unresolved. The next meaningful milestones are the expected Charlotte council action before September 23, the reported October 5 reconsideration deadline, and subsequent CRTPO and Board of Transportation decisions.

Sources

• North Carolina Session Law 2026-41
• NCDOT expands community listening period for I-77 South
• Axios Charlotte poll report
• Charlotte Observer CRTPO decision coverage

Construction was already underway behind the scenes before the end of the 2026 Panthers season, with about 65 workers active on the project, according to the report. The available information does not provide a final completion date or an event-by-event operating schedule for the stadium.

A revised look for the stadium

The renderings depict outward expansion at the stadium’s corners while preserving its park-like setting. They provide a new public view of the renovation design, rather than confirmation that the work is complete.

The stadium is expected to retain the Bank of America Stadium name for the foreseeable future despite the planned physical changes.

The report describes the renovation’s value as approximately $1.3 billion. It does not specify whether that figure covers related infrastructure beyond the stadium work itself.

Charlotte’s approved public contribution

Charlotte City Council approved a $650 million contribution to the project in June 2024. That contribution is to come from hospitality and tourism-tax revenue.

The council action established a major public commitment to the project, but the available report does not establish that the full renovation is funded. The $650 million city contribution and the approximately $1.3 billion renovation value are separate figures that should not be treated as the same amount.

The project involves a major Charlotte sports venue and a substantial construction effort. For the Panthers and the city, the new renderings show how the stadium’s form is expected to change while work continues out of public view.

What comes next

The known next step is continued behind-the-scenes construction. No final completion deadline was included in the available reporting, and no official schedule was provided showing whether the stadium will be available for every 2026 event.

That leaves the July 23 renderings as the latest confirmed public project update: a design that expands the corners, retains the stadium’s park-like setting and moves forward alongside ongoing construction activity.

Council took final action on the appointment June 22, 2026. Harrington was sworn in July 1 at the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center, becoming Charlotte’s 60th mayor.

Lyles’ resignation became effective June 30. The Council action filled a vacancy; it was not a new election to choose a replacement mayor.

Appointment process

North Carolina law and Charlotte procedures required Council to appoint a qualified candidate from the same political party as Lyles to serve the balance of the term.

City Council used a finalist interview and ballot process. Harrington was selected after a second ballot from a group of five finalists: Harrington, Harold Cogdell, Carrie Cook, James Mitchell and Caleb Theodros.

The official records identify the June 22 decision as final action, but the supplied records do not list the full tally from the final ballot. They also do not establish that the appointment was unanimous.

Harrington’s service is an appointed term ending in December 2027, when the elected term expires. The vacancy process authorized Council to name a qualified candidate for that remaining period.

Priorities as mayor

In remarks following his swearing-in, Harrington said he intends to strengthen internal collaboration, public trust and regional relationships. He also identified safety, stability and well-being as areas of focus.

The appointment determines who will lead Charlotte’s city government through the rest of the term while the city continues to confront policy questions involving growth, infrastructure, public safety and data-center regulation.

One pending policy action predates Harrington’s tenure. On June 8, Charlotte adopted a 150-day moratorium on new data-center approvals. The moratorium is scheduled to last until Nov. 5, 2026.

That measure was adopted before Harrington took the oath of office and is not an action attributed to his administration. It will, however, remain a city policy matter during his appointed service unless the city changes it.

What happens next

Harrington now serves as mayor under the Council appointment through December 2027. The cited city records do not say whether he will seek election or serve beyond that date.

The council’s earlier reversal of support effectively blocked the project at that stage. But North Carolina’s 2026 budget includes a provision that could require Charlotte and other local governments to repay the North Carolina Department of Transportation for investments already made if the project does not proceed under the required terms.

The precise amount Charlotte could owe has not been established in the available reporting. The council’s final vote date and outcome also remain pending.

State budget provision changes the stakes

The pending council action is not a final project approval or cancellation. Instead, it is a renewed local-government decision on whether to support the I-77 South toll-lane plan after the prior reversal.

NCDOT plans to spend approximately $600 million on the project. The proposed financing model includes a private partner that would recover its investment through toll revenue.

That structure is central to the policy dispute now before the city: the project remains proposed, while the state budget provision creates potential repayment consequences if it does not move ahead under the applicable terms. Available reporting does not establish how any repayment obligation would be allocated among the local governments implicated.

Vote expected by Sept. 23

Reporting on July 30 placed the council’s decision window between that date and Sept. 23. Charlotte Mayor Rob Harrington is serving as mayor during this decision period, and the toll-lane question has been identified as part of his early policy agenda.

No final council outcome is known. The upcoming vote will determine whether the council restores support or maintains its opposition to the project, with the budget provision making the consequences of that choice a live municipal and state-government issue.

Poll offers limited view of support

A July poll found that roughly half of surveyed Charlotte voters supported the toll project. The survey included 370 registered Charlotte voters and was conducted July 15 through July 18.

Its results should be read with caution. The poll was distributed by CLT Public Relations, a firm that represents local-government and other clients, and the available reporting does not provide a basis to treat it as a neutral or definitive measure of citywide opinion.

The hearing is a procedural step in the city’s consideration of the proposed borrowing measures. The legislation record says public-hearing action is required before the referendum process can advance.

The scheduled hearing does not mean the bond orders have received final City Council approval, and it does not mean voters have approved the borrowing. The Nov. 3 referendum remains the date identified in the city’s legislation record for the proposed obligation bonds.

A Council action on the August calendar

Charlotte’s 2026 City Council meeting schedule lists Aug. 10 as a Council meeting and action-preview date. The schedule also lists a regular business meeting for Aug. 3, one week before the planned hearing.

City Council is the body considering the bond-order action. The hearing gives the public a formal point in the process before the referendum moves forward under the procedure described in the legislation record.

The proposal concerns obligation bonds, a form of municipal borrowing that would be presented to voters through the scheduled referendum. The available city record connects the proposed bond orders to that Nov. 3 vote but does not establish an outcome for either Council action or the referendum.

What the available record does and does not show

The materials available for this report do not disclose a total proposed bond amount or identify the specific projects that would be financed through the bond orders. Those details should not be assumed from the hearing notice alone.

Likewise, the record does not show that the bonds have been authorized, issued or approved by voters. The confirmed development is the scheduling of the Aug. 10 public hearing and the connection of the proposal to the Nov. 3 referendum.

For voters in Mecklenburg County, the county Board of Elections provides 2026 election information. Its published calendar also lists a Board of Elections meeting for Aug. 18. The city’s referendum schedule and the county election information place the proposed bond vote within the broader 2026 election calendar.

Next known dates

The next identified City Council date for this proposal is Aug. 10, when the public hearing is scheduled. The referendum date identified by the city is Nov. 3, 2026.

Whether the proposed bond orders proceed beyond the hearing, what projects they would cover and how much they would seek to borrow are not established by the approved materials. Those questions depend on bond-order documents or later official action not included in the available record.

The committee’s agenda lists the item as “Information and Discussion.” Housing and Neighborhood Services staff are scheduled to review current city cooling initiatives and the information officials need to evaluate possible policy or ordinance changes.

When and where the discussion will take place

The meeting is scheduled for Monday, August 3, 2026, from 9 to 10:30 a.m. at the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center, 600 East Fourth Street, Room 267.

Residents and media can watch the meeting on the Government Channel or the city’s YouTube Channel, according to the agenda.

What the referral asks

Mayor Vi Lyles referred a Minimum Housing Code policy item to the committee on June 30. The referral asks the committee to determine whether applicable housing-code ordinance changes or policy recommendations that would require air conditioning should be made to the City Council for consideration.

The referral does not establish a proposed ordinance or guarantee that Charlotte will adopt an air-conditioning requirement. It places the question in an early policy-review stage.

What Monday’s meeting will—and will not—do

Staff are scheduled to review existing city cooling initiatives and discuss the key considerations and information needed to evaluate the issue. Committee members may discuss whether additional review or a recommendation is appropriate.

However, Monday’s agenda does not schedule a final vote, an adopted ordinance or a binding change to Charlotte’s housing rules. Any later recommendation, ordinance drafting, public process or full-Council action would occur separately and is not guaranteed by this meeting.

What residents should watch for

The discussion could show how city officials are beginning to frame the question for renters, landlords, homeowners and people who follow housing-code enforcement. The practical effects on those groups remain unresolved while staff and council members review the issue.

Key developments to watch include whether the committee requests additional information, supports a policy recommendation, sends a question forward for full-Council consideration or takes no further action. Until a formal proposal or ordinance is published and adopted, Charlotte has not approved a new air-conditioning requirement.

The city’s meeting listing confirms the August 3 Housing Committee meeting at the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center. The same agenda also includes a separate discussion of the city’s affordable-housing funding policy, with both items designated for information and discussion.

Sources

• Charlotte Housing Council Committee Meeting Agenda, August 3, 2026
• City of Charlotte Upcoming Meetings

The larger project estimate announced July 23, 2026, reflects additional work selected by Tepper Sports & Entertainment, including the full owner-elected scope and added design enhancements. The increased total should not be read as a $1.3 billion public expenditure. The city’s commitment remains fixed, while TSE says it will fund the additional private investment, potential project overages and ongoing maintenance obligations under the agreement.

Charlotte’s $650 million commitment

Charlotte City Council authorized up to $650 million for Bank of America Stadium improvements and a new Field House on June 24, 2024. The council action authorized the city manager to negotiate agreements with TSE and appropriated the money from proceeds of debt in the Convention Center Capital Fund.

The city says that fund is derived from hospitality and tourism taxes and must be used for legally permitted projects that support Charlotte’s tourism economy. No new taxes were required for the city’s contribution, but the project still involves public financing through the city’s capital-fund structure. Residents should distinguish between the capped city commitment, the debt used to support it and TSE’s separate private spending.

What the city agreement requires

A later city briefing described the negotiated framework for the $650 million investment. It lists a 20-year non-relocation term, with a TSE termination option after the 2039 football season, along with a $500,000 annual rent payment for use of city improvements.

The briefing also lists a $1 million annual city payment for traffic management, seven city-use days each year for the stadium or Field House, and TSE-funded capital and non-relocation-period expenditures. The exact way those provisions affect event operations and public costs is something residents should continue to follow as construction advances.

The briefing separately describes a planned performance venue next to the stadium. It is presented as a private-sector project rather than a facility funded through the city’s stadium contribution, and its lease terms include potential city-use days if the venue land remains under a later lease arrangement.

What changes for fans and Uptown visitors

Construction is already underway in less visible parts of the stadium. Interior work is taking place in 2026, while fan-facing work is expected to begin in 2027. The renovation is being phased over several years, with completion targeted for 2030.

The Panthers and Charlotte FC are expected to continue playing at the stadium during construction. That means event operations will continue alongside work that could affect entrances, circulation, amenities, traffic management and access around Uptown. The exact impact may vary by construction phase, event and area of the complex.

Axios Charlotte reported that some circulation changes are already part of the planned design, including directing South Gate exits toward Mint Street rather than Morehead Street. Those details may matter to commuters, nearby businesses and eventgoers, but construction conditions can change as the work progresses.

The announcement also included renderings of expanded gathering spaces, upgraded seating and premium areas, additional food-and-beverage and retail space, and a planned 4,400-capacity entertainment venue. Those features are part of the broader renovation vision and should not be treated as completed facilities or guarantees that every element shown will open on the same schedule.

What residents should watch next

The central taxpayer question is whether Charlotte’s public obligation stays within the approved $650 million framework as the work advances. For eventgoers and nearby businesses, the practical questions will involve construction phasing, traffic-management arrangements, event access and changes to Uptown circulation.

The 2030 completion date is a target, not a guaranteed deadline. Future city updates, construction notices and lease-related actions should clarify how the project is progressing, how public obligations are being handled and when specific fan-facing improvements will open.

Sources

• Charlotte City Council stadium improvements action
• Carolina Panthers renovation announcement
• Axios Charlotte renovation overview

At the Charlotte City Council Safety Committee meeting on April 6, interim CEO Brent Cagle told city leaders the transit agency is updating its safety plan with a mix of steps already underway and others still being built out. For riders, the practical takeaway is fairly simple: more security visibility is happening now, while a dedicated fare-inspection team appears to be the next major change CATS wants to put in place.

What riders may notice first

CATS and local TV reporting say the agency is already leaning on off-duty police, contracted security, cameras and staff training as its first line of response.

According to the city’s rider-facing safety page, CATS says its third-party security partner is now fully staffed along the Blue Line and backed by more than 1,000 hours of off-duty Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police support. The agency also says nearly 4,500 cameras are active across buses, trains and stations, with more upgrades planned after a review of blind spots.

WSOC TV reported that Cagle told the committee CATS has installed systemwide live-stream security cameras, expanded off-duty police coverage and provided de-escalation training for frontline staff. Those are the changes riders are most likely to feel immediately, especially on rail platforms, trains and busy transit hubs.

Why fare checks are moving to the center of the plan

The next visible shift could be fare enforcement. The CATS safety page says a dedicated Fare Inspection Team will launch in 2026 to conduct proof-of-payment checks and provide customer assistance. The agency also says riders should expect ongoing fare enforcement across both bus and rail.

Spectrum News 1 reported that CATS is developing that team through a request-for-proposals process and that Cagle told leaders about 45% of riders are not paying fares. That figure should be treated as a CATS claim reported by Spectrum, not as an independently verified public statistic.

The larger point for residents is that CATS is framing fare enforcement as part of system order and rider confidence, not as a standalone answer to violent crime. Its formal security plan lists fare policy and fare enforcement as one of the core parts of the strategy and says fare inspectors would handle proof-of-payment checks with security backup when needed.

What is still in planning, not finished

Some of the ideas getting attention are still clearly in development.

WSOC TV and Spectrum News 1 both reported that CATS is researching artificial intelligence and advanced video analytics. The official plan describes that work as research and pilot programs, not a systemwide rollout. The same document also places an in-house transit police department in a longer-term category, meaning it should not be treated as approved or imminent.

That matters because the timelines are not the same. A fare-inspection team is presented as a near-term operational change. A transit police department would be a much bigger structural decision tied to staffing, funding, planning and likely additional approvals.

Why CATS is under pressure now

This is not just a messaging exercise. A focused Federal Transit Administration audit released in February found 18 findings of non-compliance for CATS. The audit also said the rate of crimes against passengers on the system was three times the national average, while assaults on transit workers had jumped to five times the national average in 2025.

That federal scrutiny helps explain why CATS is now talking not just about more officers or more cameras, but about documented fixes, staffing plans, policy changes and better monitoring.

What to watch next

For riders and employers who depend on transit, the next question is whether the plan turns into funded positions, signed contracts and measurable on-the-ground changes.

In the short run, riders should expect more visible security and a push toward proof-of-payment checks in 2026. In the longer run, watch for budget follow-through, procurement moves on fare inspection, and whether CATS advances any formal proposal for a transit police department beyond the planning stage.

Sources

• Charlotte Safety Committee meeting listing
• CATS Safety and Security page
• CATS Integrated Security and Public Safety Plan
• FTA audit of CATS safety plan
• WSOC TV safety plan update
• Spectrum News 1 CATS security update