Richmond plans Flock camera renewal as audit violation raises privacy questions

Richmond plans to renew its 99-camera Flock automated license-plate-reader system through at least 2027, according to Axios Richmond, while a first-quarter 2026 audit found that an RPD sergeant violated the department’s rule against sharing ALPR data outside Virginia.

The renewal has not been confirmed as a City Council approval. The council’s final agenda for September 14, 2026, does not visibly list a Flock-specific ordinance or contract vote, and the meeting record says minutes were still in draft status. For now, the renewal is best described as planned or reported rather than finalized by council.

What Richmond’s system does

Richmond Police Department says it operates 99 fixed Flock ALPR cameras throughout the city. RPD also says it has two mobile ALPR devices mounted on trailers, with plans to increase that number to four. The mobile units are deployed intermittently for traffic-related issues and in locations with heightened crime concerns.

The devices capture information from vehicles traveling on public roads. RPD says investigators use the system to assist with violent-crime investigations, stolen vehicles, hit-and-run cases, Amber Alerts and missing-person incidents.

RPD says ALPR information is available for specific investigative queries for 21 days, after which it is automatically purged. The department also says data can be retained longer when it has been downloaded and preserved for a specific, ongoing criminal investigation.

RPD’s stated sharing limits

RPD says its ALPR data is not shared with federal agencies or with law-enforcement agencies outside Virginia. The department says its investigators must use the system only for purposes authorized by Virginia law.

On May 19, 2026, the city announced an additional restriction: RPD would prohibit sharing Flock data with Virginia jurisdictions that have entered into 287(g) agreements with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Richmond’s announcement also said the city has not entered into a 287(g) agreement and does not participate in federal immigration enforcement.

These are the safeguards RPD and the city say govern the system. They describe the department’s policies, but the policies themselves do not establish that every use complies with them.

First-quarter audit found one violation

RPD’s first-quarter 2026 audit found a single policy violation involving an authorized user who was assisting with a homicide investigation. According to the department, an FBI special agent requested an image of a vehicle believed to be in Richmond and connected to a homicide investigation in Washington, D.C.

The RPD sergeant searched for and provided the image to the federal official. RPD said that conduct violated its policy barring the sharing of ALPR data with agencies outside Virginia. The department said the incident was not related to immigration enforcement and was reported to Virginia State Police as required by state law.

RPD said the Richmond Commonwealth’s Attorney was consulted and declined prosecution based on the facts presented. The department’s Office of Professional Standards then conducted an internal investigation, and the sergeant’s authorization to access ALPR data was deactivated.

RPD’s Flock page separately reports that its second-quarter 2026 audit found no violations of Virginia law.

What remains unclear about the renewal

Axios reported on September 9 that Richmond plans to renew its Flock contract through at least 2027. The report does not establish that City Council has approved the renewal. The September 14 council agenda lists 31 meeting items, including land-use ordinances, an affordable-dwelling-unit advisory committee proposal and other city business, but no clearly identified Flock contract or ALPR ordinance.

The available records do not confirm the renewal’s final contract terms, cost or approval path. A future contract record, procurement filing, budget action, council discussion, policy update or audit disclosure could provide the next confirmed step.

For Richmond residents, the practical question is how the city balances the system’s stated role in crime investigations with rules governing access, sharing, retention and enforcement. The first-quarter audit shows that a stated restriction was violated at least once; the department’s response shows the corrective steps it says followed.

Sources

Look for updates to this story

Discover more from Interactive News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.