Seventh Circuit grants en banc review, stays AAP injunction

On July 8, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted en banc reconsideration in American Academy of Pediatrics v. Uthmeier, vacated its June 22 panel opinion, and stayed a Northern District of Illinois preliminary injunction that was dated June 8.

What the district court ordered in June i

In the Northern District of Illinois, U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Kennelly’s memorandum opinion (signed June 2, 2026) granted AAP a preliminary injunction. The Seventh Circuit later summarized the effect: the district court enjoined Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier from pursuing the state court action against the American Academy of Pediatrics.

What changed in the Seventh Circuit on July 8 i

The July 8 order did three procedural things at once:

• Granted the request for en banc reconsideration.
• Vacated the earlier June 22 panel opinion.
• Stayed the district court’s preliminary injunction pending resolution of the appeal and issuance of the Seventh Circuit’s mandate.

Practically, that means the district court’s temporary block is paused while the case moves forward through initial en banc review.

Who’s affected while the stay is in place i

AAP’s ability to rely on that preliminary injunction to halt the Florida enforcement case is on hold during the en banc proceedings. For now, Uthmeier’s state court action is not blocked by the stayed federal preliminary injunction.

What to watch next i

The Seventh Circuit said it will set a new briefing schedule and a date for oral argument by separate order. That follow-up scheduling—plus the en banc court’s eventual decision on the underlying First Amendment dispute—are the near-term things that determine whether the injunction is restored, narrowed, or replaced.

Sources

• Seventh Circuit en banc order (July 8, 2026)
• Northern District of Illinois injunction memorandum opinion (signed June 2, 2026)